/dIs’kol’lek’tIs/
A fusion of disoriented states regarding the intellect and the intuition – a disharmonised and
conflicted will of both the intellect and the intuit. In the process of individuation, aspects of the individual processes - consciously or subconsciously - the notions of what is inherently good and the required state to attain. When the individual consciously acts in opposition to their inherently good nature, intentionally and consistently resisting for a period of time, dyskhollectus seems to spawn or begin to develop. Eventually, the state of the individual begins to manifest states of anguish in various forms. Expressing their internal anguish in unruly ways – transposing and manifesting its malevolent nature. The subject appears to be consumed with something akin to being possessed and/or hypnotised, containing elements and attributes of dysphoria, haughtiness, resentment, vindictiveness, hatred, anger, murderous-will, obsessive-compulsive, viciousness, rage, unrelenting, restlessness, sadism, and excessively or disproportionately antagonistic. Containing an obsessive-fixated persistence to impede boundaries whilst motivated by malevolent intent. Motivated with the intent to inflict pain, annihilate, or simulate a chaotic environment. The subject(s) possessed by its force does not appear to be conscious or aware of its force as though they are hypnotised, yet primarily expresses all actions and motives in a manner that is calculating or exacting. An indicative characteristic of dyskhollectus externally appears in the hybridised form of sociopathy and psychopathy.
The idea of dyskhollectus and its development are found in many stories. Starting with the story Adam & Eve in the garden of Eden. She develops a fixation and obsession to eat from the tree of knowledge of good & evil. Though she understood that eating from it was not permitted, she found a way to rationalise, justify, and ignore her intellect and intuitive aspect and proceeded to eat the fruit. Genesis 3: 4-6 4 "And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat." Traits of obsession and fixation seem to have been perpetuated through her son Cain as though it were epigenetic, this is displayed by how he treated his brother Abel. (Note: Teaching the next generation how to steal will not produce petty thieves, instead will only produce armed robbers willing to kill for the pettiest things). What Eve developed had morphed or evolved into something more indescribable from the original scenario with herself and Adam. Eve indirectly committed an act of murder against her husband since she understood that there were consequences to her choices. (One could make the assumption she did not want to be left alone to suffer those consequences, hence she gave the fruit to her husband. This is not to imply that she is directly responsible for what Adam had ultimately decided). Cain developed resentment, jealousy, hatred, anger, and a murderous will against his brother, which evidently had all been simmering internally for sometime, thus he began scheming on how he would execute his plan - battling the conflicting modality within him. He had now found a way to rationalise and justify the execution of his desire, which was developed through his fixation and obsession. This is displayed by the fact that God attempted to reason with him, aiming to lead Cain towards making the right choice and nurturing positive thoughts, whilst aiming to enlighten him toward the choice and that the problem was internal, leading him to realise that murdering his brother would not resolve his internal dilemma, nor quench his dysfunctional thirst for blood. The text below suggests that if one had time to lie and wait, implies he had ample time to reconsider thoughts and actions, but it seemed he was consumed by the attributes of dyskhollectus. In this case, it was anger, viciousness, rage, murderous will, unrelenting, resentment and hatred. The obsessive and fixated thoughts spawned the spirit or force of dyskhollectus, which eventually possessed or hypnotised him into submmitting to his murderous will. Genesis 4:4-8 And Abel also brought of the firstlings of his flock and the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: but unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell. And the LORD said unto Cain, why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him. And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.
Dyskhollectus reflects the indecisive, conflicting, and anguish of the intellect and intuit. Humans seem to have an intrinsic desire to love and aim to do good. Unfortunately, the force of dyskhollectus causes one to be consumed or possessed by its power, once completely shutting off one’s conscience. This is evident in the story of Pharoah king of Egypt and the exodus of Moses and his people. Several times, Pharaoh granted the request of Moses but appears to abruptly have a change of heart - this becomes a repeating occurrence throughout the interaction of Pharaoh and Moses. The key aspect is the concept of Pharaoh’s "heart hardening." The hardened heart aspect captures what is one of the roots of the dyskhollectus dilemma – where the individual almost seems disconnected or absent – appearing to have no sense of what is referred to as being "humane in nature." In the final moments, when he grants Moses and his people an opportunity to leave Egypt, they leave the borders of Egypt, Pharoah is consumed by feelings of hate and murderous will. He pursued Moses and his people blindly, consumed by rage, without considering the ramifications or consequences – he did not seem phased or concerned about how many lives had been and would be affected by his relentless drive. Exodus 9:12 And the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh, and he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had spoken unto Moses.
There seems to be a contrast with going against the "will of God," with purposeful intent, when motivated to do so for a period of time, which eventually results in the individual obtaining something quite contrary to the tranquil or peaceful spirit of God. Correlating this idea to the story of King Saul and David. Saul develops a deep hatred towards David, rooted in jealousy, which mirrors the dilemma of Cain against his brother Abel. This relentless nature is described in the bible as "the spirit of God had left Saul," hence his uneasiness. 1 Samuel 16:14 But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him. The spirit of tranquillity was replaced by a spirit of evil and restlessness. At times, Saul would have moments of peace and love towards David, suddenly he would abruptly switch into a murderous rage against David. 1 Samuel 19:9-10 Later, in Saul’s house, David was playing the harp. Saul was there with his spear in his hand. Then an evil spirit from the LORD came on Saul. Saul threw his spear at David and tried to pin him to the wall. Something causes the mind of an individual to abruptly switch modalities when consumed by the force of dyskhollectus, manifesting unreasonable rage that is vicious and may be described as evil due to its disproportionate nature. Like Cain with Abel, dyskhollectus crouches, waiting for its moment to pounce as a predator with its prey. It seems, that man is inclined toward two forms of extremes when left alone to their devices, extreme good or extreme evil. It seems, in these cases, these stories display their inclination toward the trap of dyskhollectus.
This aspect of dyskhollectus could also be described as the "Jezebel spirit." When Jezebel pursued Elijah the prophet, she was consumed by the murderous will against a man who would not submit to her will and control – contrary to her husband, Ahab. For every Jezebel, there is an Ahab who is a weak-willed man, resentful, spiteful, bitter, insecure, and extremely jealous, primarily focused on the little they do not have in comparison to the abundance that they may already own. They run to their Jezebels complaining about how they have not received what they desired by way of corruption and manipulation, hence they wallow in their contempt, resentment, bitterness, and hatred. 1 Kings 21: 4 – 6 And Ahab came into his house heavy and displeased because of the word which Naboth the Jezreelite had spoken to him: for he had said, I will not give thee the inheritance of my fathers. And he laid him down upon his bed, and turned away his face, and would eat no bread. But Jezebel his wife came to him, and said unto him, Why is thy spirit so sad, that thou eatest no bread? And he said unto her, Because I spake unto Naboth the Jezreelite, and said unto him, Give me thy vineyard for money; or else, if it please thee, I will give thee another vineyard for it: and he answered, I will not give thee my vineyard.
1 Kings 19:1-2 And Ahab told Jezebel all that Elijah had done, and withal how he had slain all the prophets with the sword. Then Jezebel sent a messenger unto Elijah, saying, so let the gods do to me, and more also, if I make not thy life as the life of one of them by tomorrow about this time. The description and elaboration regarding aspects of dyskhollectus are found in Revelation 2:20 Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. The nature of Ahab merely highlights the dyskhollectus force, which manifests through his wife Jezebel, acting as the conduit. The Jezebel spirit is the manifestation of negative emotions of people like Ahab and Loki – aiming towards the worst possible route, scheming to create hell for all those all around them.
This same bitterness and resentment formed out of jealousy are depicted in the stories relating to Thor and Loki. Thor was known for being brazen, and hot-tempered, he appeared abrupt to those who contained resentment and jealousy. Thor had the propensity to call out anything treacherous, conniving, snide, or subtle, and subliminal intent (pasive-aggressive) to cause any form of harm or insult – Loki was known to be disloyal, sabotaging, and had treasonous behaviour. We find in the story of Thor, on his quest for his hammer, Loki had caused Thor to be in a predicament - Thor was forced to disguise himself as a woman. Knowing this would embarrass Thor, it seemed to have made Loki happy to see Thor lose his dignity by being emasculated. Norse Myths & Tales, Legends of Thor: ‘Look, now Loki: it was an excellent joke, and so far you have done well, - after your crafty fashion, which likes me not. But not I have my hammer again, and the joke is done. From you, nor from another, I brook no laughter at my expense. Henceforth we will have no mention of this masquerade, nor of these rags which now I throw away. Do you hear, red laugher?’ And Loki heard, with a look of hate, and stifled his laughter as best he could; for it is not good to laugh at him as he holds his hammer. Not once after that was there mention in Asgard of the time when Thor dresses him as a girl and won his bridal gift from Thyrm the giant. But Miolnr was safe once more in Asgard, and you and I know how it came there; so, someone must have told. I wonder if red Loki whispered the tale so some outsider, after all? Perhaps it may be so, for now, he knew how best to make Thor angry; and from that day when Thor forbade his laughing, Loki hated him with the mean little hatred of a mean little soul.
Dyskhollectus will be present within a collective possessed by its force, for the ways of those consumed by it are motivated by the same incomprehensible result. When there is a cluster of people consumed by dyskhollectus it seems to cover the boundaries of groups of people or regions, acting as if it is a biological plague contained within a parameter, in this case, seemingly contained by something metaphysical or aethereal. However, there are cases of people not being ‘infected’ by it despite being surrounded by the very people intoxicated or infected by it, such as the case of Lot. Genesis 19:4-11 Before they had gone to bed, all the men of the city of Sodom, both young and old, surrounded the house. They called out to Lot, saying, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Send them out to us so we can have relations with them!”Lot went outside to meet them, shutting the door behind him. “Please, my brothers,” he pleaded, “don’t do such a wicked thing! 8Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them to you, and you can do to them as you please. But do not do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.” “Get out of the way!” they replied. And they declared, “This one came here as a foreigner, and he is already acting like a judge! Now we will treat you worse than them.” And they pressed in on Lot and moved in to break down the door.But the men inside reached out, pulled Lot into the house with them, and shut the door. And they struck the men at the entrance, young and old, with blindness, so that they wearied themselves trying to find the door. This story, also clearly depicts the possession form of dyskhollectus. Though they were blinded, they were driven to fulfill their heinous and vicious acts in a way that displays their calculating and exacting intent. In the same way, God had aimed to communicate with Cain so that he may be able to reflect within and make the right choice, the blindness of these men aimed to make them realise how deeply they had degenerated and had the opportunity to turn away from their corruption. Instead, this scenario simply highlighted the corruption of dyskhollectus within when they could no longer restrain themselves.
Regarding,"a cluster that infects the parameter or region," one could assume that the influence may contain an ethereal or spiritual phenomenon. This association would be correlated with the notion of prevalent "ruling spirits" who essentially have jurisdiction over a particular region. Ruling spirits by jurisdiction are displayed in the book of Daniel 10:4-20 On the twenty-fourth day of the first month, as I was standing on the bank of the great river, the Tigris, I lifted up my eyes, and behold, there was a certain man dressed in linen, with a belt of fine gold from Uphaz around his waist. His body was like beryl, his face like the brilliance of lightning, his eyes like flaming torches, his arms and legs like the gleam of polished bronze, and his voice like the sound of a multitude. Only I, Daniel, saw the vision; the men with me did not see it, but a great terror fell upon them, and they ran and hid themselves. So I was left alone, gazing at this great vision. No strength remained in me; my face grew deathly pale, and I was powerless. I heard the sound of his words, and as I listened, I fell into a deep sleep, with my face to the ground.Suddenly, a hand touched me and set me trembling on my hands and knees.He said to me, “Daniel, you are a man who is highly precious. Consider carefully the words that I am about to say to you. Stand up, for I have now been sent to you.” And when he had said this to me, I stood up trembling.“Do not be afraid, Daniel,” he said, “for from the first day that you purposed to understand and to humble yourself before your God, your words were heard, and I have come in response to them. However, the prince of the kingdom of Persia opposed me for twenty-one days. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I had been left there with the kings of Persia. Now I have come to explain to you what will happen to your people in the latter days, for the vision concerns those days.”While he was speaking these words to me, I set my face toward the ground and became speechless. And suddenly one with the likeness of a man touched my lips, and I opened my mouth and said to the one standing before me, “My lord, because of the vision, I am overcome with anguish, and I have no strength. How can I, your servant, speak with you, my lord? Now I have no strength, nor is any breath left in me.”Again the one with the likeness of a man touched me and strengthened me. “Do not be afraid, you who are highly precious,” he said. “Peace be with you! Be strong now; be very strong!” As he spoke with me, I was strengthened and said, “Speak, my lord, for you have strengthened me.” “Do you know why I have come to you?” he said. “I must return at once to fight against the prince of Persia, and when I have gone forth, behold, the prince of Greece will come. But first I will tell you what is inscribed in the Book of Truth. Yet no one has the courage to support me against these, except Michael your prince.
Regarding the "unrestraint," it seems to be parallelled with those who have this strange desirable urge to stalk, behaving like a predator by constantly following their subject though they may not attempt to make contact - usually driven out of supposed ‘love’ or hate. Their fixated obsession with merely tracking their moves seems to provide them with a strange sense of satisfaction as though they have gained a dopamine injection from their addiction. This seems to be factors of unresolved and lack of emotional and intellectual synchronicity. This is evidently found in the those who stalked Jesus, those who had hatred and resentment towards him may be likened to Ahab and Loki. As we know, this eventually resulted in something like Cain crouching to pounce at his brother in the fields. “The Lord of the Rings” captures this obsession quite well. Those found to have the ring suddenly seem to be possessed by its power. The subject submits and commits evil for it. Initially, they appear to be docile, which captures the "hypnotic" nature of dyskhollectus. Once the characters in "The Lord of the Rings" had the ring, they became incapable of reasoning and their level of consciousness or awareness suddenly appeared completely absent. Though their consciousness or sentient state appeared absent, their "malevolent intent" seems quite evident.
The crucifixion of Jesus, by those who caused inflictions upon him, is the embodiment and captures the true nature of dyskhollectus. The uncontrollable rage and irrational hatred by the people chanting for his death to fall upon him, simultaneously had desired to save Barabbas was the symbolic representation of the collective state of being. Barabbas was redeemed in place of Christ according to their will (unreasonably choosing to save a reprobate over an innocent man).
John 18:40 Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas.
Mathew 27:25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.
1 Peter 2:21-24 For even here unto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously: Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
The Apostle Peter describes the suffering and torment Jesus had experienced, descriptions are found in all texts of Mathew, Mark, and Luke gospels. The angle suggested here is, that the suffering, pain, anguish, mental illness, and emotional instability, found within the people, who tortured Jesus found themselves transposing those states of being or tormented modality. Their motivation to express their torment was a psychosomatic experience, this transposition may be understood as a form of "scapegoating," diverting all their internal turmoils. Jesus bore their physical pain, mental, and emotional suffering - the pain and sickness of such a people, who lacked guidance on how to internalise, process, filter, or articulate their internal conflict and anguish, had eventually found themselves manifesting and transposing the ills of dyskhollectus in an extremely cruel way.
In conclusion, the Dyskhollectus phenomenon seems to be a hybrid of multiple factors. The first appears to be psychological factors, such as the psychoanalytic history of an individual, along with trauma-related experiences. Secondly, a biological aspect potentially influences an individual's erratic behaviours. Last but not least, a spiritual aspect.